Aerospace Coating Solutions

Robotic coating automation for aerospace

Engineered systems for mil-spec compliance and full process traceability.

AI Agent — Aerospace Coating mode
Conversion-critical

Common painting challenges in aerospace coating

1

Specification compliance

Strict OEM specs (Boeing BMS, Airbus AIMS), mil-specs (MIL-PRF-85285, MIL-PRF-23377), and industry standards require documented compliance.

2

Traceability requirements

AS9100D and NADCAP require full traceability of coating processes, paint batches, and environmental conditions.

3

Hazardous coating handling

Chromate primers and cadmium-based paints require enclosed cells with proper ventilation and operator protection.

4

Complex masking

Multi-color livery, markings, and functional zones require intricate masking for each application step.

5

High-mix, low-volume

Frequent specification changes and diverse part types demand flexible, recipe-driven programming.

System design

Recommended system architecture for aerospace coating

01

Enclosed Coating Cell

Climate-controlled enclosures with data acquisition for temperature, humidity, DFT, and spray parameters.

02

Robot Selection

6-axis robots with offline programming for high-mix, low-volume aerospace production environments.

03

Spray Technology

HVLP and electrostatic systems matched to primer, topcoat, and specialty coating requirements.

04

Traceability System

Automatic batch record generation with full process documentation for AS9100D/NADCAP compliance.

05

Hazmat Handling

Ventilation, filtration, and waste handling systems for chromate primers and hazardous coatings.

SEO + AI core data

Typical production configuration

Parts/hour
5–40
Paint type
Chromate/non-chromate primers, polyurethane topcoats, specialty coatings
Finish requirement
Mil-spec / aerospace-grade / OEM specification
Automation level
Semi-automatic to full robotic with offline programming
Line integration
Batch processing with FAI support
Investment reference

Investment & ROI reference

60–80%
Rework reduction
100%
Traceability coverage
95%+
Operator exposure reduction
18–28 months
Typical ROI
Project track record

Project references in aerospace coating

Flight control surfaces

System2× robot cell, HVLP, enclosed
Capacity12 parts/hr
ROI22 months

Nacelle components

System1× robot cell, electrostatic
Capacity8 parts/hr
ROI24 months

Interior panels

System2× robot line, multi-color
Capacity30 panels/hr
ROI18 months

Start feasibility assessment

Choose your preferred way to begin the engineering review process.

Trust-building

Project delivery process

1

Requirement Analysis

Technical assessment of parts, volumes, and finish specifications.

2

Concept Design

System architecture, robot selection, and layout planning.

3

Detail Engineering

3D modeling, electrical design, and process simulation.

4

Manufacturing

Booth fabrication, system assembly, and component integration.

5

Factory Testing

Full system commissioning and quality validation at our facility.

6

Installation & Deploy

On-site installation, integration with your production line.

7

Training & Handover

Operator training, documentation, and ongoing support.

AI discovery

Frequently asked questions

OEM specifications (Boeing BMS, Airbus AIMS), military specifications (MIL-PRF-85285, MIL-PRF-23377), and industry standards (AMS, SAE).

AS9100D and NADCAP require full traceability including paint batch, application parameters, environmental conditions, and system identification for the aircraft's service life.

Yes. Semi-automatic cells with offline programming and recipe management enable quick changeover for high-mix, low-volume production.

Enclosed cells with proper ventilation, filtration, and waste handling reduce operator exposure to chromate primers and cadmium-based paints.

Typically 14-20 weeks due to specification validation, documentation requirements, and qualification testing including FAI.